Set Learning for Accurate and Calibrated Models
Lukas Muttenthaler, Robert A. Vandermeulen, Qiuyi Zhang, Thomas Unterthiner, Klaus Robert Muller
OpenReview ground truth
TL;DR — We introduce odd-k-out learning (OKO), a novel, theoretically grounded training framework for classification based on learning from sets of data to yield accurate and well-calibrated models, even in low data regimes.
Abstract
Model overconfidence and poor calibration are common in machine learning and difficult to account for when applying standard empirical risk minimization. In this work, we propose a novel method to alleviate these problems that we call odd-$k$-out learning (OKO), which minimizes the cross-entropy error for sets rather than for single examples. This naturally allows the model to capture correlations across data examples and achieves both better accuracy and calibration, especially in limited training data and class-imbalanced regimes. Perhaps surprisingly, OKO often yields better calibration even when training with hard labels and dropping any additional calibration parameter tuning, such as temperature scaling. We demonstrate this in extensive experimental analyses and provide a mathematical theory to interpret our findings. We emphasize that OKO is a general framework that can be easily adapted to many settings and a trained model can be applied to single examples at inference time, without significant run-time overhead or architecture changes.
Author context
Most prolific author: 3 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 32 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 61% of matchups.
- ▲ beat Learning Polynomial Problems with $SL(2, \… ×12
- ▲ beat Demystifying CLIP Data ×6
- ▲ beat Closing the gap on tabular data with Fouri… ×4
- ▲ beat VTruST : Controllable value function based… ×4
- ▲ beat On the Effect of Defection in Federated Le… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)