PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Lewis's Signaling Game as beta-VAE For Natural Word Lengths and Segments

Ryo Ueda, Tadahiro Taniguchi

self/semi-supervised learningEmergent CommunicationEmergent LanguageProbabilistic Generative ModelVariational Autoencoderbeta-VAEZipf’s law of abbreviationHarris’s articulation scheme
25.60100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.30)
18.00100
Mimo
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)
39.60100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.43)

OpenReview ground truth

Accepted

TL;DR — We reinterpret Lewis's signaling game, a frequently used setting in emergent communication, as beta-VAE and reformulate its objective function as ELBO.

Abstract

As a sub-discipline of evolutionary and computational linguistics, emergent communication (EC) studies communication protocols, called emergent languages, arising in simulations where agents communicate. A key goal of EC is to give rise to languages that share statistical properties with natural languages. In this paper, we reinterpret Lewis's signaling game, a frequently used setting in EC, as beta-VAE and reformulate its objective function as ELBO. Consequently, we clarify the existence of prior distributions of emergent languages and show that the choice of the priors can influence their statistical properties. Specifically, we address the properties of word lengths and segmentation, known as Zipf's law of abbreviation (ZLA) and Harris's articulation scheme (HAS), respectively. It has been reported that the emergent languages do not follow them when using the conventional objective. We experimentally demonstrate that by selecting an appropriate prior distribution, more natural segments emerge, while suggesting that the conventional one prevents the languages from following ZLA and HAS.

Author context

Most prolific author: 1 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)