Density Ratio Estimation-based Bayesian Optimization with Semi-Supervised Learning
Jungtaek Kim
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
Bayesian optimization has attracted huge attention from diverse research areas in science and engineering, since it is capable of finding a global optimum of an expensive-to-evaluate black-box function efficiently. In general, a probabilistic regression model, e.g., Gaussian processes and Bayesian neural networks, is widely used as a surrogate function to model an explicit distribution over function evaluations given an input to estimate and a training dataset. Beyond the probabilistic regression-based Bayesian optimization, density ratio estimation-based Bayesian optimization has been suggested in order to estimate a density ratio of the groups relatively close and relatively far to a global optimum. Developing this line of research further, a supervised classifier can be employed to estimate a class probability for the two groups instead of a density ratio. However, the supervised classifiers used in this strategy are prone to be overconfident for a global solution candidate. To solve this problem, we propose density ratio estimation-based Bayesian optimization with semi-supervised learning. Finally, we demonstrate the experimental results of our methods and several baseline methods in two distinct scenarios with unlabeled point sampling and a fixed-size pool.
Author context
Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 38 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 43% of matchups.
- ▼ lost to There is More to Graphs than Meets the Eye… ×6
- ▲ beat Generative Modeling with Phase Stochastic … ×6
- ▼ lost to Optimal Sketching for Residual Error Estim… ×4
- ▼ lost to Escaping Saddle Point Efficiently in Minim… ×4
- ▼ lost to Test like you Train in Implicit Deep Learn… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 38)