PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Parallelizing non-linear sequential models over the sequence length

Yi Heng Lim, Qi Zhu, Joshua Selfridge, Muhammad Firmansyah Kasim

general MLparallel algorithmrecurrent neural networksneural ordinary differential equationssequential models
94.50100
Fused
band ≈ ±16 pct pts (from σ = 0.32)
92.00100
Mimo
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.45)
95.80100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.45)

OpenReview ground truth

Accepted

TL;DR — We present a parallel algorithm to evaluate and training sequential models (e.g., RNN & NeuralODE) despite their inherent sequential nature

Abstract

Sequential models, such as Recurrent Neural Networks and Neural Ordinary Differential Equations, have long suffered from slow training due to their inherent sequential nature. For many years this bottleneck has persisted, as many thought sequential models could not be parallelized. We challenge this long-held belief with our parallel algorithm that accelerates GPU evaluation of sequential models by up to 3 orders of magnitude faster without compromising output accuracy. The algorithm does not need any special structure in the sequential models' architecture, making it applicable to a wide range of architectures. Using our method, training sequential models can be more than 10 times faster than the common sequential method without any meaningful difference in the training results. Leveraging this accelerated training, we discovered the efficacy of the Gated Recurrent Unit in a long time series classification problem with 17k time samples. By overcoming the training bottleneck, our work serves as the first step to unlock the potential of non-linear sequential models for long sequence problems.

Author context

Most prolific author: 1 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)