Bridging Sequence and Structure: Latent Diffusion for Conditional Protein Generation
Matt McPartlon, Céline Marquet, Tomas Geffner, Daniel Kovtun, Alexander Goncearenco, zach@vant.ai, Luca Naef, Michael M. Bronstein, Jinbo Xu
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
Protein design encompasses a range of challenging tasks, including protein folding, inverse folding, and protein-protein docking. Despite significant progress in this domain, many existing methods address these tasks separately, failing to adequately leverage the joint relationship between protein sequence and three-dimensional structure. In this work, we propose a novel generative modeling technique to capture this joint distribution. Our approach is based on a diffusion model applied on a geometrically-structured latent space, obtained through an encoder that produces roto-translational invariant representations of the input protein complex. It can be used for any of the aforementioned tasks by using the diffusion model to sample the conditional distribution of interest. Our experiments show that our method outperforms competitors in protein docking and is competitive with state-of-the-art for protein inverse folding. Exhibiting a single model that excels on on both sequence-based and structure-based tasks represents a significant advancement in the field and paves the way for additional applications.
Author context
Most prolific author: 11 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 34 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 65% of matchups.
- ▲ beat Equivariant Deep Weight Space Alignment ×8
- ▼ lost to De novo Protein Design Using Geometric Vec… ×6
- ▼ lost to Graph Neural Networks for Learning Equivar… ×6
- ▲ beat Scalable Long Range Propagation on Continu… ×6
- ▲ beat Measuring Graph Similarity Using Transfer … ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)