PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Learning Energy-Based Models by Cooperative Diffusion Recovery Likelihood

Yaxuan Zhu, Jianwen Xie, Ying Nian Wu, Ruiqi Gao

generative modelsEnergy-based modelrecovery-likelihoodcooperative learning
87.00100
Fused
band ≈ ±16 pct pts (from σ = 0.31)
81.90100
Mimo
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.43)
91.00100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.45)

OpenReview ground truth

Accepted

TL;DR — We propose cooperative diffusion recovery likelihood (CDRL) model. Our model substantially improves the generation performance of EBM-based generative models.

Abstract

Training energy-based models (EBMs) on high-dimensional data can be both challenging and time-consuming, and there exists a noticeable gap in sample quality between EBMs and other generative frameworks like GANs and diffusion models. To close this gap, inspired by the recent efforts of learning EBMs by maximimizing diffusion recovery likelihood (DRL), we propose cooperative diffusion recovery likelihood (CDRL), an effective approach to tractably learn and sample from a series of EBMs defined on increasingly noisy versons of a dataset, paired with an initializer model for each EBM. At each noise level, the two models are jointly estimated within a cooperative training framework: Samples from the initializer serve as starting points that are refined by a few MCMC sampling steps from the EBM. The EBM is then optimized by maximizing recovery likelihood, while the initializer model is optimized by learning from the difference between the refined samples and the initial samples. In addition, we made several practical designs for EBM training to further improve the sample quality. Combining these advances, we significantly boost the generation performance compared to existing EBM methods on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet 32x32. And we have shown that CDRL has great potential to largely reduce the sampling time. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of our models for several downstream tasks, including classifier-free guided generation, compositional generation, image inpainting and out-of-distribution detection.

Author context

Most prolific author: 8 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)