Unified Anomaly Detection via Multi-Scale Contrasted Memory
Loïc Jézéquel, Ngoc-Son Vu, Jean Beaudet, Aymeric Histace
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
Deep anomaly detection (AD) aims to provide robust and efficient classifiers for one-class (OC) and outlier-exposure (OE) settings. However current models still struggle on edge-case normal samples and are often unable to keep high performance over different scales of anomalies. Additionally, there is a lack of a unified framework that efficiently addresses both OC and OE settings. To address these limitations, we present a novel two-stage method which leverages multi-scale normal prototypes during training to compute an anomaly deviation score. First, we employ a novel memory-augmented contrastive learning (CL) to jointly learn representations and memory modules across multiple scales. This allows us to effectively capture subtle features of normal data while adapting to varying levels of anomaly complexity. Then, we train an efficient anomaly distance-based detector that computes spatial deviation maps between the learned prototypes and incoming observations. Our model outperforms the state-of-the-art on a wide range of anomalies, including object, style, and local anomalies, as well as face presentation attacks. Notably, it stands as the first model capable of maintaining exceptional performance across both OC and OE settings.
Author context
Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 32 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 53% of matchups.
- ▲ beat ImAD: An End-to-End Method for Unsupervise… ×6
- ▼ lost to A New Type of Associative Memory Network w… ×4
- ▼ lost to STanHop: Sparse Tandem Hopfield Model for … ×4
- ▲ beat Gaussian Process-Based Corruption-resilien… ×4
- ▲ beat DREAM: Dual Structured Exploration with Mi… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)