PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

LegoNet: Piecing Together and Breaking Apart Sub-Networks for Scalable Multi-task Learning

Zitian Chen, Mingyu Ding, Yikang Shen, Wei Zhan, Erik Learned-Miller, Chuang Gan

transfer & meta learningmulti-task learningcontinous learningefficient adaptation
25.10100
Fused
band ≈ ±14 pct pts (from σ = 0.28)
25.90100
Mimo
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.39)
27.40100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

Abstract

Despite considerable progress in general-purpose vision models, most efforts focus on designing a new unified structure that can handle different types of input and supervision. In contrast, we believe each vision task requires its specific designed module to use different forms of perception. For example, a feature pyramid network is commonly used in segmentation but not in classification. We present LegoNet, a general Multi-Task Learning (MTL) framework that is assembled with many small sub-networks from different vision tasks, similar to how Lego pieces can be pieced together into larger structures. By leveraging this property, LegoNet can borrow design elements from single-task models and combine them to create a scalable multi-task model. We demonstrate its efficiency on mainstream vision datasets such as ImageNet, COCO, and ADE20K, and show it achieves comparable results to state-of-the-art single-task models. Moreover, like a Lego creation capable of dynamically piecing together or breaking apart pieces, our model exhibits scalability in both its model capacity and adaptability to a multitude of tasks. It can remove sub-networks and decompose into high-performing components for efficient adaptation, or add sub-networks for learning new tasks in a continuous learning scenario. On downstream tasks, it can be fine-tuned with fewer training parameters, fewer model parameters, and even transformed to a low computation shape. These functions can be controlled and combined to meet various demands of downstream applications.

Author context

Most prolific author: 16 submissions (credibility 0.20).

Delta if applied: -1.2 percentile

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Battle history — 36 comparisons

Ranked above opponent in 49% of matchups.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 36)