Unmasking Transformers: A Theoretical Approach to Data Recovery via Attention Weights
Yichuan Deng, Zhao Song, Shenghao Xie, Chiwun Yang
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
In the realm of deep learning, transformers have emerged as a dominant architecture, particularly in natural language processing tasks. However, with their widespread adoption, concerns regarding the security and privacy of the data processed by these models have arisen. In this paper, we address a pivotal question: Can the data fed into transformers be recovered using their attention weights and outputs? We introduce a theoretical framework to tackle this problem. Specifically, we present an algorithm that aims to recover the input data $X \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times n}$ from given attention weights $W = QK^\top \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times d}$ and output $B \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ by minimizing the loss function $L(X)$. This loss function captures the discrepancy between the expected output and the actual output of the transformer. Our findings have significant implications for the Localized Layer-wise Mechanism (LLM), suggesting potential vulnerabilities in the model's design from a security and privacy perspective. This work underscores the importance of understanding and safeguarding the internal workings of transformers to ensure the confidentiality of processed data.
Author context
Most prolific author: 10 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 34 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 21% of matchups.
- ▼ lost to Simple mechanisms for representing, indexi… ×12
- ▼ lost to Hybrid Reinforcement Learning for Optimizi… ×12
- ▲ beat FENNs: A Resource-Efficient, Adaptive, Pri… ×10
- ▲ beat Efficient OCR for Building a Diverse Digit… ×10
- ▼ lost to Metanetwork: A novel approach to interpret… ×8
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)